full-disclosure - Re: Sony: No firewall and no patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:40:57 +0200
From: phocean <0x90@...cean.net>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Sony: No firewall and no patches

 If you say so, then it must be true.

 On Wed, 11 May 2011 11:33:37 +0000, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> On May 11, 2011, at 6:05 PM, phocean wrote:
>
>>  Passive FTP is the first example that comes to my mind where 
>> inspection (based on statefulness) is needed.
>
>
> I really don't want to continue this on full-disclosure, but there's
> still no material security value to stateful inspection in front of
> servers, with either active or passive ftp.
>
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@...or.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
>
> 		The basis of optimism is sheer terror.
>
> 			  -- Oscar Wilde
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/