lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:15:09 +0000 From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@...or.net> To: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> Subject: Re: Sony: No firewall and no patches On May 12, 2011, at 12:09 AM, phocean wrote: > I still don't see how the hell the typical web server will handle as much traffic as one of these Checkpoint, Cisco or whatever monsters. That's the dread secret - they aren't really 'monsters'. > But on a large network with inter-vlan filtering, it matters a lot. Believe me, this one is based on my operational experience. Size <> complexity, complexity <> size. They are orthogonal concepts. Small networks can be complex, large networks can be simple. > I still trust more the network stack of a Linux/BSD/IOS dedicated box than the one of a Windows Server. Sure - but that has nothing to do with the 'sanity checks' and 'inspectors', which are custom-coded. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@...or.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> The basis of optimism is sheer terror. -- Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists