| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=szFiHWi769Su8e2Ftg1FcDon=CQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:24:16 +1000 From: "Ivan ." <ivanhec@...il.com> To: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@...merofgod.com> Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> Subject: Re: Sony: No firewall and no patches Ill throw this into the mixer while on topic of FWs The TCP Split Handshake: Practical Effects on Modern Network Equipment http://nmap.org/misc/split-handshake.pdf On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Thor (Hammer of God) <thor@...merofgod.com> wrote: > > > I would be extremely interested to learn details of how a stateful firewall in > > front of a server saved a company, when stateless ACLs in hardware-based > > network infrastructure devices would've led to failure. Seriously, if you don't > > mind outlining the scenario, I think it would be very instructive. > > I'd be happy to - I too would like to dive a bit deeper into what your points are as I find them interesting as well. Let's take it offline - you can share back with the group if you feel it valuable. > > t > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists