full-disclosure - Re: Sony: No firewall and no patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110515151718.2F0C.0@paddy.troja.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 15:23:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pavel Kankovsky <peak@...o.troja.mff.cuni.cz>
To: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Sony: No firewall and no patches

On Wed, 11 May 2011, Dobbins, Roland wrote:

> So the outbound stateful checking of server response traffic is moot,
> and simply constitutes a stateful DDoS chokepoint which makes it trivial
> for an attacker to take down the server in question by filling up the
> state-tables of said firewall with well-formed,
> programatically-generated traffic.

<irony>
Yup. We all know servers handle traffic without any of those
pesky state-tables that can be filled up with well-formed,
programatically-generated traffic.
</irony>

-- 
Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak                          / Jeremiah 9:21        \
"For death is come up into our MS Windows(tm)..." \ 21st century edition /

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/