lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4DF01BC4.1070703@greyhat-security.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:33:00 +0930 From: Stephen <stephen@...yhat-security.com> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: full-disclosure-- I don't think it really matters if everyone agrees - all you have to do is filter subject lines with XSS/PHP/everything else you didn't want to see. At worst, all you have to do is rescue a few strays from your filter folder, or delete a couple that your filters missed... On 08/06/11 23:25, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote: > On 8 Jun 2011, at 14:49, T Biehn wrote: > http://tinyurl.com/45x8qw3 > > Yes, very true, but only if everybody agrees, otherwise it's no easier than fighting spam. Maybe it will work, but I'd sooner not the false positives. > > Cheers, > Sabahattin > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists