full-disclosure - Re: (no subject)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTinq-izyDPLgnj=FHrTkAi_zOnqnMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:42:42 -0700
From: "Zach C." <fxchip@...il.com>
To: nix@...roxylists.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: (no subject)

To borrow a mechanism from 'chan' boards...

> not telling how everything works
> expecting me to trust it blindly
> false positives extremely possible
> arrogant affirmation of probably inflated success rate and development
periods
> anonymity-hostile

Lol wat
On Jun 9, 2011 6:21 PM, <nix@...roxylists.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:40:16 +0300, nix@...roxylists.com said:
>>
>>> Im happy to hear it works out to you. A few days ago, i received an
>>> email
>>> from https://www.proxpn.com/ admin that he suspended fraudulent user VPN
>>> account due to the abuse. A fraudster used a stolen credit card using
>>> their VPN to purchase a service from us. Needless to say, their CIDR's
>>> has
>>> been also added to this list.
>>
>> You're incredibly lucky it was proxpn.com and not comcast.com. ;)
>>
> I sense sarcasm. Im exacly aware of comcast and almost all other U.S cable
> providers residental address ranges. Did you happend to know that comcast
> do also provide static IP's for companies, dedicated hosting.
>
> Im also fully aware of botnet proxies that are spreaded wide to comcast
> ranges, not only to comcast, to a majority of U.S cable providers. We have
> a method to detect some of those botnet proxies but I wont go in to
> details for obvious reasons.
>
> Once again, almost none of you did not bothered to read features. You have
> the option to CHOOSE will you block hosting providers or not. It does not
> block anything by default.
>
> This is my last reply to this topic.
>
> Simply, it does provide protection to those who wants it and everyone can
> configure their API in the way they want. None is not enforced to block
> anything. Period.
>
> Atleast I managed to open discussion. Something else than daily boring
> XSS/CRLF bugs.
>
> Thanks to everyone for the feedback and interests, whether it was positive
> or negative.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/