full-disclosure - Re: FYI: Apache httpd NoFollowSymLink follows symlinks feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTinVaxGFMjgBdDaBj8vsPx887MCFmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:24:01 +0200
From: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@...il.com>
To: halfdog <me@...fdog.net>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: FYI: Apache httpd NoFollowSymLink follows
 symlinks feature

> The
>>
> FAQ says: "You can usually avoid problems by either finding the
> Options directive that already applies to a specific directory and
> changing it, or by putting your Options directive inside the most
> specific possible <Directory> section."
>
> The option is in the most specific directory section and it also takes
> effect, returning forbidden on http request. But when you use the
> RenameLoop program in parallel, it fails to detect the symlink and
> delivers the linked data. This specific TOCTOU issue is known and part
> of the apache specification.
>

I didn't mean to imply otherwise, I've just explained what does the
+/- before an option does.

Tyrael

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/