| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH7Z6-JOjyhEisHfFZdB-ncXCKgrRnpHUzTrNHxpimu8Gg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:45:30 +0200 From: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@...il.com> To: Tim <tim-security@...tinelchicken.org> Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> Subject: Re: Encrypted files and the 5th amendment On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Tim <tim-security@...tinelchicken.org> wrote: >> Actually, there is no way to tell if the there is another encrypted >> volume in existence or not. One might stipulate that there "could" be >> if the filesize is obvious, but when you get into gig size files that >> are storing small amounts of data, that argument loses value. > > Well, yes, if you are trying to hide small amounts of data, then there > are many ways to do it with plausible deniability. I thought you were > talking about booting entire separate OSes based on boot-time > password. Would be hard to hide that amount of data without at least > raising suspicion to a determined investigator. > > Then again, many investigators are not determined. Keep the partition > small, put it inside another encrypted partition, maybe they'll miss > it. > check out the link in the last mail, seems to be what you are looking after. http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/?s=hidden-volume http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/?s=hidden-operating-system -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists