full-disclosure - Re: Hiding Backdoors in plain sight, again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E2D8CB6.1080503@coresecurity.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:33:10 -0300
From: Ariel Waissbein <ariel.waissbein@...esecurity.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>
Subject: Re: Hiding Backdoors in plain sight, again

On 22/7/11 12:39 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:17:33 -0300, CoreTex Team said:
> 
>> Finding: Scoring Table	Placebo	Backdoored
>> Correctly Identified	5 (voted as placebo)	2 (voted as backdoored)
>> Incorrectly Identified	-1 (voted as backdoored)	-12 (voted as placebo)
> 
> How many points does somebody get for managing to exploit a placebo? :)
> 
> 

Vladis,

The rules are clear. If you say you find a backdoor in a placebo, it
does not matter if it has a backdoor or not, you get -1 points. We
cannot guarantee that a program will be non-vulnerable :)

On the other hand, if you do: then shoot us an email at info [ at:]
backdoohiding and we will reward the first one to do it!

The CoreTex team

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/