full-disclosure - Re: Apache Killer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFB=mGABqpUqjF9ntf=ACav=SaB6S6EYEvER7gZeEYo1A_M3xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:43:06 +0200
From: "HI-TECH ." <isowarez.isowarez.isowarez@...glemail.com>
To: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Apache Killer

Hi Michal,
just for the record I have the impression that this not the same vulnerability
you outlined in your advisory a while back. It is more that the idea
for this vulnerability originated from your advisory, not the same bug.
Actually I even think that the while back when you released the advisory
there was a patch for both Apache and IIS by limiting the maximal Byte Range
headers slightly. This is a feeling I got over years of fuzzing for httpd bugs.

Regards,

Kingcope

2011/8/24 HI-TECH . <isowarez.isowarez.isowarez@...glemail.com>:
> Hi Michal,
> What do you think from where this originated ?
> Was you outlining it a while back :)
>
> /kc
>
> 2011/8/24 Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>:
>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/401638
>>
>> FWIW, I pointed out the DoS-iness of their Range handling a while ago:
>> http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2007/Jan/83
>>
>> /mz
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/