lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <125C543E-F50A-4A76-8A7E-0D6C288F7241@eatel.net> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:09:23 -0500 From: David <dchurch@...el.net> To: Marco Ermini <marco.ermini@...il.com> Cc: Full-Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> Subject: Re: Apache Killer To be clear, that is just to simply know your under attack? There is nothing you can do about it yet? On Aug 25, 2011, at 11:57 AM, Marco Ermini <marco.ermini@...il.com> wrote: > On 24 August 2011 16:23, ZOne wrote: >> For those using Snort, a local snort rule to alert for incoming attacks >> might help while waiting for a patch. >> >> example: >> >> alert tcp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> any 80 (msg:"INBOUND Apache Killer script: >> Local web server is under attack."; content:"Range:bytes=0-"; classtype: >> denial-of-service; threshold: type threshold, track by_src, count 5 , >> seconds 20; sid:3000005;) > > For those using Snort, you should take care that this rule is very > easy to break: it just detects a string "Range:bytes=0-" inside of TCP > packets sent to port 80, sent five times in twenty second by the same > IP. > > That is very easy to avoid, just using a different initial byte than > zero, putting a space between "Range:" and "bytes", or changing the > threshold. Basically it is violating rule 1 of IDS signature writing, > "patch the vulnerability, not the exploit" - as just changing the > exploit as little as a single space will not make it work. > > I did instead the following: > > alert tcp any any -> any $HTTP_PORTS ( \ > content: "Range"; nocase; http_header; \ > pcre:"/(\d\,){6,}/xH"; http_header; \ > msg:"Apache DOS http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Aug/175"; \ > reference:cve,2011-3192 ) > > However this is certainly not the best possible as I am no Snort rules > guru. Also I have not tested it. > Another one possibly faster, can be something like the following > (again I have not tested it): > > pcre: "/^Range:bytes\s+\d+-\d?,\d+-\d+,\d+-\d+,\d+-\d+,\d+-\d+,\d+-\d+,/xH"; > http_header; \ > > > Cheers > -- > Marco Ermini > root@...an # mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research > http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcoermini > "Jesus saves... but Buddha makes incremental back-ups!" > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists