lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4E6AEA4B.90006@yahoo.co.jp> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:40:43 +0900 From: 夜神 岩男 <supergiantpotato@...oo.co.jp> To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: Recent claims that windows update is broken "Journalistic integrity"? Such anachronism, Thor; and quite a surprise coming from you. This is the Internet circa 2011 + Humanity circa Anytime. Nothing more can be expected from a bunch of unwashed monkeys with keyboards lacking the talent to truly create. On 09/10/2011 10:20 AM, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote: > I don’t think anyone actually believed this; It sounded more like Joro > was trolling on behalf of the blog monkeys J > > It really does make me wonder if the > publish-whatever-we-see-posted-elsewhere-while-abandoning-journalistic-integrity-to-drive-ad-clicks > model is actually working for these people. I suppose it must be, > otherwise these guys wouldn’t be selling off little pieces of their soul > with each article. > > t > > *From:*full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk > [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] *On Behalf Of *Dan > Kaminsky > *Sent:* Friday, September 09, 2011 3:09 PM > *To:* Georgi Guninski > *Cc:* full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk > *Subject:* Re: [Full-disclosure] Recent claims that windows update is broken > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com > <mailto:guninski@...inski.com>> wrote: > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/09/07/diginotar_hacker_proof/ > "I'm able to issue windows update," he [Comodohacker] wrote. > "Microsoft's statement about Windows Update and that I can't issue such > update is totally false!" > > The original Comodohacker statement is at: http://pastebin.com/85WV10EL > > Is this true? > > For the record, no. Windows Update doesn't just depend on > WinVerifyTrust, it also calls CertVerifyCertificateChainPolicy with the > CERT_CHAIN_POLICY_MICROSOFT_ROOT flag, documented here: > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa377163(v=vs.85).aspx > > > -- > joro > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists