full-disclosure - Re: owning ubuntu apt-key net-update (maybe apt-get update related)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110925092959.GA1944@sivokote.iziade.m$>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 12:29:59 +0300
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>
To: GloW - XD <doomxd@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: owning ubuntu apt-key net-update (maybe
 apt-get update related)

On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 07:49:19AM +1000, GloW - XD wrote:
> Aha, sounds like typical (unfortunately), the case of the 'sads' on Ubuntus
> behalf.
>  This is what unfortunately stops somany people from reporting, just that
> BIT of acknowledgemnt, even just a thanks on theyre webpage, but instead
> they people think "oh well, this guy has probably raped 5000 boxes then
> given us this" , it must be the approach of some companies, or they have
> very pathetic secteams, (in ubuntus cause, -no comment rofl).
> anyhow thx for clearing that up.
> cheers,
> xd
> 
>

10x.

btw, there is strange behaviour with colliding gpg key IDs.

the first one totally shadows the second one, which might potentially be exploitable.

a possible scenario might be to trick the user to import the forged key ID first.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/