[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E8A621D.30604@oneechan.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:32:13 -0700
From: Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit?
On 10/3/2011 4:29 PM, GloW - XD wrote:
> There's only 4 billion IP's to scan if he want to get all out of his
> trick.
>
> Synscan can do a subnet (class b) in ~3 minutes nowdays ;)
> I would think he would find it.
> i did a scan on a kit i found, root:barcelona123 , and, got like 100
> boxes in 10minutes of scanning, ofc, i looked up the IP range, usually
> they scan by range and classes, log to file, then log in.
> It is very fast nowdays, and very effective if done properly... i have
> seen this only recently become "effevive" but, it is..and there is
> plenty of fools who will execute it as-is... that is just, to easy,
> every box a kid has root on, will opfc try it *just incase that, fd is
> wrong* ...and i have seen one case already ;p so, it is the easiest
> way to engineer, *keep this private* or pvt pvt pvt dont leak!
> khehe.. best trix ever.
> xd
>
>
> On 4 October 2011 02:29, <nix@...roxylists.com
> <mailto:nix@...roxylists.com>> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/25728/w000t-shell.c.html
> >
> > It's a trojan, based on the w00t-shell.c code; the shell code adds a
> > passwordless root account under the name w000t.
> >
>
> Nice try though. I was not aware that this shellcode was freely
> available
> but after debugging the same shellcode I noticed that passwordless
> account.
>
> He'll have plenty of work to do while scanning for that SSH account.
> There's only 4 billion IP's to scan if he want to get all out of his
> trick.
>
> >
> > Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:31:29 +0100
> > From: d.martyn.fulldisclosure@...il.com
> <mailto:d.martyn.fulldisclosure@...il.com>
> > To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> <mailto:full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
> > Subject: [Full-disclosure] Apache 2.2.17 exploit?
> >
> > I regularly trawl Pastebin.com to find code - often idiots leave
> some 0day
> > and similar there and it is nice to find.
> >
> > Well, seeing as I have no test boxes at the moment, can someone
> check this
> > code in a VM? I am not sure if it is legit or not.
> >
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/ygByEV2e
> >
> > Thanks :)
> >
> > ~Darren
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Someone should write a scanner that checks for that stuff + pulls RSA
keys from the web and adds it to a keyring, that would be a nice scanner.
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists