full-disclosure - Re: VPN providers and any providers in general...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAExQ7uJCzO5wPL2MYC19Z1_KLnBtGetKvjrEX8MH0LX961_ctQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 21:32:31 -0500
From: adam <adam@...sy.net>
To: Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: VPN providers and any providers in general...

>>
http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00754.htm

Did you actually read the link you pasted?

[...] and "criminal penalties *may not be imposed on someone who has not
been afforded the protections* that the Constitution requires of such
criminal proceedings [...] protections include the right [..]

Then take a look at the actual rights being referenced. Most of which *would
be violated* as a result.

In response to 0x41 "This is ONCE you are actually in front, of the
judge...remember, it may take some breaking of civil liberty, for this to
happen... "

No, you're absolutely right. That's the point here. Contempt is attached to
the previous court order, there wouldn't be a new judge/new case for the
contempt charge alone. All of it is circumstantial anyway, especially due to
how much power judges actually have (in both criminal AND civil
proceedings).

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/