lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <190DFDD2F99A65469B4B15D3658C0D2B06D0322D@PTC6.ponderosatel.com> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:26:32 -0700 From: "Daniel Sichel" <daniels@...derosatel.com> To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> Subject: Snail mail vs. Email >Well there is no push to make snail-mail encrypted and lets face it most >peoples mailboxes don't have any sort of locking mechanisms and is >available to anyone with two hands and the malicious intent to steal >someones mail however the US Gov needs a warrant to intercept your >physical mail, why does it being online somehow make it different? What makes it different (and this is just me speaking, I don't really know how others feel or what current political thinking is on this)is that the internet represents a new, unregulated medium that can redefine some traditional standards and ways of doing Things in order to do them better. For me, as a conservative, less regulation an more personal responsibility is better. I will say something probably a bit unusual, especially these days, reasonable men may differ on this view. A very credible argument for regulation can be made, I just keep coming back the reality that virtually every regulated medium of communication becomes a point of control. To shamelessly steal and warp a phrase, "The power to regulate is the power to destroy." I would prefer to be responsible for my own privacy and pit my skills against the Feds at keeping it that way rather than "trust" them not to abuse their access to my "protected" email. I work in the phone business and we have CALEA requirements which supposedly allows law enforcement to carry out their sanctioned wire taps anonymously to protect suspects' right to privacy. I may be wrong, but it seems pretty abusable (if that's a word) to me. I do NOT want that on the Internet. Cheers, Dan Sichel _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists