lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E98D481.9030705@oneechan.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:32:01 -0500
From: Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [OT] Obama said: "American people understand
 that not everybody's been following the rules"

On 10/14/2011 6:32 PM, xD 0x41 wrote:
> Cristiano , per favor' mi dai dieci minuti scusa mi ma, e' essentiale ..
> You really dont realise how much, you attack others when they post, 
> NOMATTER what the topic... yet you are still wondering why somany 
> people seem to despise your skinny little nerdy ass... well, nerdy 
> isnt bad, but, your a downright lookalike for mr.Bean aka rowan 
> atkinson. You could maybe do his stunts, to ?
> Your the one who is usually abusing others, before the finality wich 
> is simply adults not reesponding, to the baby whos crying out for more 
> aarguements.
> You should stfu, and learn more, you assume to know all, in every 
> post, your the brain, yet you are lame, i looked everything up abiout 
> you, and yes, go ahead, and setup a nice wordpress secure setting, php 
> wise to,  then yes, id maybe hink your atleast a halfwit ;)
> Anyhow, your basically a tr0ll, and, you seem to keep goading, even 
> AFTER the others, have completely stopped responding to you, simply 
> because, Laurelai was right, why would anyone want to keep up a thread 
> wich has now turned malign, as i forsaw a week ago, but, i did not 
> think it would even make a week, People like you, keep inspiring the 
> flame to burn brighter.. wich to me, is nastier than any *abuse* 
> names, wich, you clearly have not counted howmany times you have 
> actually called others, some form of rude name/word/personal attack.
> Maybe when you GROW UP, and behave as an adult, then I would assume 
> the list will start to hear you, even through the bs.
> Anyhow, i applaud you, for *coming out* as to say, I mean, putting 
> your pic up, like that, mate, you could be a pornstar! what you doin 
> online :P~~~bahahaha
> go back to grade.2 then repeate it, then move on... then, if you work 
> out how to call 911, call someone who gives a shit.
> Idiotic kid, grow the hell up.
> xd--
>
> // IND SEC CONSILTANT FOR Yep yep Security (simply coz it sounds good) 
> YEP YEP for all your Hat attire needs!
>
> On 15 October 2011 08:57, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com 
> <mailto:uuf6429@...il.com>> wrote:
>
>     Yeah, let's just all ignore low insults. The world would be a much
>     better place without them and whoever said them in the first place...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org
>     <mailto:laurelai@...echan.org>> wrote:
>
>         On 10/14/2011 2:25 PM, Christian Sciberras wrote:
>>         Resorting to personal attacks? Nice.
>>
>>         Technical skills in what? Running a wordpress blog? Defacing
>>         a website? Growing pot?
>>
>>         I rarely publicise any materials, most of the time I just
>>         tell whoever is responsible to do a fix.
>>         I'm not really running after publicity, unlike you guys.
>>         Also note that I never said I'm a seasoned hacker... in fact,
>>         my occupation is quite on the opposite side of the spectrum...
>>
>>         You also seem to know more than I do what the Ubuntu VM I
>>         have contains.
>>
>>         But that must make all the difference! I mean, people that
>>         don't know qubits from bits shouldn't be allowed in such
>>         discussions
>>         (of course there's wikipedia...)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Georgi Guninski
>>         <guninski@...inski.com <mailto:guninski@...inski.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             Christian Sciberras,
>>
>>             I have trouble judging your technical skills - all I have
>>             seen is bad smalltalk.
>>
>>             Do you have any technical publications you can share so I
>>             can judge?
>>
>>             btw, the best i found was you could could reproduce a bug
>>             in a CMS and in addition you can't tell root from user
>>             password on vanilla ubuntu.
>>
>>             --
>>             joro
>>
>>             On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 02:11:13AM +0200, Christian
>>             Sciberras wrote:
>>             > > So if they cause damage for profit that makes it ok?
>>             >
>>             > No. But it's certainly better than doing damage without
>>             profit. Making
>>             > profit means that at the end of the day, the money's
>>             going to go somewhere
>>             > further in the chain.
>>             > Flattening a tower, for instance, or attacking the
>>             local bank that refused
>>             > to give you a loan because of the time you spent in a
>>             cell, isn't as
>>             > productive.
>>             > Neither is it making a company loose clients/profit
>>             just because they
>>             > decided they don't want you to use their services (as
>>             if you did have a
>>             > right in the first place...).
>>             >
>>             > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a
>>             measure of responsibility
>>             > in the situation too, human beings are by nature
>>             imperfect, but the largest
>>             > share of responsibility lies with the names listed below.
>>             >
>>             > The largest share? I can see Ex-president Bush trying
>>             to sell you a bottle
>>             > of beer for $10 dollars ($7 profit). Wait, I can't.
>>             >
>>             > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid back
>>             every dime of it,
>>             > most people are decent human beings and would do the same.
>>             >
>>             > Most people? I could have sworn 90% of the people in
>>             the NYC subway would
>>             > thank $deity if you suddenly dropped dead so they could
>>             get things off you.
>>             > Call me cynical, but I wouldn't trust anyone else in
>>             such cases, other than
>>             > myself.
>>             >
>>             >
>>             > Regarding that list of yours, great! Now we just need a
>>             little more effort.
>>             > For each of those persons, please enlighten us as to
>>             what they did legally
>>             > wrong.
>>             > Of course, the people that landed in jail shouldn't be
>>             counted. The "99%
>>             > protest" is a modern one committed to change, it just
>>             can't right wrongs by
>>             > pointing at jailed people.
>>             >
>>             >
>>             >
>>             >
>>             > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Laurelai
>>             <laurelai@...echan.org <mailto:laurelai@...echan.org>> wrote:
>>             >
>>             > >  On 10/13/2011 9:18 AM, Christian Sciberras wrote:
>>             > >
>>             > > I simply acknowledge the fact that some people work
>>             hard to get "obscenely
>>             > > rich", but I just can't stand people that cause
>>             damage for the fun of it.
>>             > >
>>             > >  So if they cause damage for profit that makes it ok?
>>             > >
>>             > >  Yes, I stick for everyone that minds his business,
>>             instead of ruining
>>             > > others' for the fun of it.
>>             > >
>>             > >  What bothers me is the fact that those hypocrites
>>             (protesters) are crying
>>             > > out loud against some people they're highly envious
>>             of with the excuse of
>>             > > "the depression".
>>             > > Well, here's the news; the famous depression has been
>>             brought about by
>>             > > these same people!
>>             > >
>>             > >
>>             > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a
>>             measure of responsibility
>>             > > in the situation too, human beings are by nature
>>             imperfect, but the largest
>>             > > share of responsibility lies with the names listed below.
>>             > >
>>             > >
>>             > >
>>             > >
>>             > >  If someone above is collecting free money because of
>>             incentives for
>>             > > people to spend money (and which seem to work well),
>>             I can't blame him.
>>             > >
>>             > >  Yes because trickle down theory worked *so* well
>>             > >
>>             > >  How many times in your life have you paid back
>>             something you received by
>>             > > mistake and which wasn't yours?
>>             > > While I would foremost applaud anyone that would
>>             right such a wrong, I just
>>             > > can't ignore the fact that those people out there
>>             representing the "99%" are
>>             > > big-time hypocrites.
>>             > >
>>             > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid back
>>             every dime of it,
>>             > > most people are decent human beings and would do the
>>             same.
>>             > >
>>             > >
>>             > >  On a different argument, since you seem to know well
>>             enough how some of
>>             > > the 1% are doing immoral things, why don't you start
>>             by handing out names
>>             > > instead of talking air just as the "99%" crowd has
>>             been doing up till now?
>>             > >
>>             > > *Alan Greenspan, chairman of US Federal Reserve 1987-
>>             2006
>>             > > **Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England
>>             > > **Bill Clinton, former US president*
>>             > > *Gordon Brown, prime minister*
>>             > > *George W Bush, former US president*
>>             > > *Senator Phil Gramm
>>             > > **Abby Cohen, Goldman Sachs chief US strategist
>>             > > **Kathleen Corbet, former CEO, Standard & Poor's
>>             > > **"Hank" Greenberg, AIG insurance group
>>             > > **Andy Hornby, former HBOS boss
>>             > > **Steve Crawshaw, former B&B boss
>>             > > **Adam Applegarth, former Northern Rock boss
>>             > > **Dick Fuld, Lehman Brothers chief executive
>>             > > **Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin
>>             > > **Lewis Ranieri
>>             > > **Joseph Cassano, AIG Financial Products
>>             > > **Chuck Prince, former Citi boss
>>             > > **Angelo Mozilo, Countrywide Financial
>>             > > **Stan O'Neal, former boss of Merrill Lynch*
>>             > > *Jimmy Cayne, former Bear Stearns boss
>>             > > **Christopher Dodd, chairman, Senate banking
>>             committee (Democrat)
>>             > > **Geir Haarde, Icelandic prime minister
>>             > > **John Tiner, FSA chief executive, 2003-07*
>>             > >
>>             > >
>>             > > Oh yeah and lets not forget about this guy
>>             > >
>>             http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877337,00.html
>>             > > And while he is thankfully spending time in a prison
>>             cell, so many other
>>             > > names on this list go free, in fact a good chunk of
>>             them made a profit off
>>             > > of the disaster.
>>             > >
>>             > >
>>             > >
>>
>>             > _______________________________________________
>>             > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>             > Charter:
>>             http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>             > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>>
>
>         Lets keep the discussion above the belt guys ok?
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>     Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>     Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Whats wrong with being skinny? *ducks*

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ