full-disclosure - Re: [Full-flame-war] There used to be a security mailing list at this address.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD6s_XtOxMbaBDYU6VYAmRwLnMMW=2ytvS7oLpLXGq+DsFfbWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 14:32:06 +0200
From: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
To: dave bl <db.pub.mail@...il.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>,
	"Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>
Subject: Re: [Full-flame-war] There used to be a security
 mailing list at this address.

Guess it all depends on who's "topposting"...

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 6:27 AM, dave bl <db.pub.mail@...il.com> wrote:

> On 15 October 2011 14:11, Thor (Hammer of God) <thor@...merofgod.com>
> wrote:
> > Haven't we made it to the point where top posting is OK?  I mean, it
> works from a Ped Xing standpoint, why not here?  It is REALLY that bad?
>
> I thought this was a security mailing list not an exercise in "how not
> to do it" TM. Also, "top-posting" really isn't that "big" of a deal.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/