Message-ID: <CAD6s_XsaxaAWi8oc+oQzTgr82icKcvahq8ctPU=8=tCRVu8f9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 03:21:46 +0200
From: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
To: Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [OT] Obama said: "American people understand
 that not everybody's been following the rules"

You think I'm biting that?

Skinny and "under-age"  is just about everything you could come up with.
Congrats for creativity.

Just because two of you decided you found common grounds for insult doesn't
mean you're god-almighty-indisputably-right in every piece of shit you come
up with. Did I mention it's shit?

With that, I give you one, you have a point, I should have stopped
responding ever since some guy decided to equate a couple dozen of people
into America's 1%.

Strange, thought security guys would have been better with numbers...






On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org> wrote:

>  On 10/14/2011 6:32 PM, xD 0x41 wrote:
>
> Cristiano , per favor' mi dai dieci minuti scusa mi ma, e' essentiale ..
> You really dont realise how much, you attack others when they post,
> NOMATTER what the topic... yet you are still wondering why somany people
> seem to despise your skinny little nerdy ass... well, nerdy isnt bad, but,
> your a downright lookalike for mr.Bean aka rowan atkinson. You could maybe
> do his stunts, to ?
> Your the one who is usually abusing others, before the finality wich is
> simply adults not reesponding, to the baby whos crying out for more
> aarguements.
> You should stfu, and learn more, you assume to know all, in every post,
> your the brain, yet you are lame, i looked everything up abiout you, and
> yes, go ahead, and setup a nice wordpress secure setting, php wise to,  then
> yes, id maybe hink your atleast a halfwit ;)
> Anyhow, your basically a tr0ll, and, you seem to keep goading, even AFTER
> the others, have completely stopped responding to you, simply because,
> Laurelai was right, why would anyone want to keep up a thread wich has now
> turned malign, as i forsaw a week ago, but, i did not think it would even
> make a week, People like you, keep inspiring the flame to burn brighter..
> wich to me, is nastier than any *abuse* names, wich, you clearly have not
> counted howmany times you have actually called others, some form of rude
> name/word/personal attack.
> Maybe when you GROW UP, and behave as an adult, then I would assume the
> list will start to hear you, even through the bs.
> Anyhow, i applaud you, for *coming out* as to say, I mean, putting your pic
> up, like that, mate, you could be a pornstar! what you doin online
> :P~~~bahahaha
> go back to grade.2 then repeate it, then move on... then, if you work out
> how to call 911, call someone who gives a shit.
> Idiotic kid, grow the hell up.
> xd--
>
> // IND SEC CONSILTANT FOR Yep yep Security (simply coz it sounds good) YEP
> YEP for all your Hat attire needs!
>
> On 15 October 2011 08:57, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, let's just all ignore low insults. The world would be a much better
>> place without them and whoever said them in the first place...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org> wrote:
>>
>>>   On 10/14/2011 2:25 PM, Christian Sciberras wrote:
>>>
>>> Resorting to personal attacks? Nice.
>>>
>>>  Technical skills in what? Running a wordpress blog? Defacing a website?
>>> Growing pot?
>>>
>>>  I rarely publicise any materials, most of the time I just tell whoever
>>> is responsible to do a fix.
>>> I'm not really running after publicity, unlike you guys.
>>> Also note that I never said I'm a seasoned hacker... in fact, my
>>> occupation is quite on the opposite side of the spectrum...
>>>
>>>  You also seem to know more than I do what the Ubuntu VM I have
>>> contains.
>>>
>>>  But that must make all the difference! I mean, people that don't know
>>> qubits from bits shouldn't be allowed in such discussions
>>> (of course there's wikipedia...)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Christian Sciberras,
>>>>
>>>> I have trouble judging your technical skills - all I have seen is bad
>>>> smalltalk.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have any technical publications you can share so I can judge?
>>>>
>>>> btw, the best i found was you could could reproduce a bug in a CMS and
>>>> in addition you can't tell root from user password on vanilla ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> joro
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 02:11:13AM +0200, Christian Sciberras wrote:
>>>> > > So if they cause damage for profit that makes it ok?
>>>> >
>>>> > No. But it's certainly better than doing damage without profit. Making
>>>> > profit means that at the end of the day, the money's going to go
>>>> somewhere
>>>> > further in the chain.
>>>> > Flattening a tower, for instance, or attacking the local bank that
>>>> refused
>>>> > to give you a loan because of the time you spent in a cell, isn't as
>>>> > productive.
>>>> > Neither is it making a company loose clients/profit just because they
>>>> > decided they don't want you to use their services (as if you did have
>>>> a
>>>> > right in the first place...).
>>>> >
>>>> > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a measure of
>>>> responsibility
>>>> > in the situation too, human beings are by nature imperfect, but the
>>>> largest
>>>> > share of responsibility lies with the names listed below.
>>>> >
>>>> > The largest share? I can see Ex-president Bush trying to sell you a
>>>> bottle
>>>> > of beer for $10 dollars ($7 profit). Wait, I can't.
>>>> >
>>>> > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid back every dime of
>>>> it,
>>>> > most people are decent human beings and would do the same.
>>>> >
>>>> > Most people? I could have sworn 90% of the people in the NYC subway
>>>> would
>>>> > thank $deity if you suddenly dropped dead so they could get things off
>>>> you.
>>>> > Call me cynical, but I wouldn't trust anyone else in such cases, other
>>>> than
>>>> > myself.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Regarding that list of yours, great! Now we just need a little more
>>>> effort.
>>>> > For each of those persons, please enlighten us as to what they did
>>>> legally
>>>> > wrong.
>>>> > Of course, the people that landed in jail shouldn't be counted. The
>>>> "99%
>>>> > protest" is a modern one committed to change, it just can't right
>>>> wrongs by
>>>> > pointing at jailed people.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > >  On 10/13/2011 9:18 AM, Christian Sciberras wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I simply acknowledge the fact that some people work hard to get
>>>> "obscenely
>>>> > > rich", but I just can't stand people that cause damage for the fun
>>>> of it.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  So if they cause damage for profit that makes it ok?
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  Yes, I stick for everyone that minds his business, instead of
>>>> ruining
>>>> > > others' for the fun of it.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  What bothers me is the fact that those hypocrites (protesters) are
>>>> crying
>>>> > > out loud against some people they're highly envious of with the
>>>> excuse of
>>>> > > "the depression".
>>>> > > Well, here's the news; the famous depression has been brought about
>>>> by
>>>> > > these same people!
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a measure of
>>>> responsibility
>>>> > > in the situation too, human beings are by nature imperfect, but the
>>>> largest
>>>> > > share of responsibility lies with the names listed below.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  If someone above is collecting free money because of incentives for
>>>> > > people to spend money (and which seem to work well), I can't blame
>>>> him.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  Yes because trickle down theory worked *so* well
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  How many times in your life have you paid back something you
>>>> received by
>>>> > > mistake and which wasn't yours?
>>>> > > While I would foremost applaud anyone that would right such a wrong,
>>>> I just
>>>> > > can't ignore the fact that those people out there representing the
>>>> "99%" are
>>>> > > big-time hypocrites.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid back every dime of
>>>> it,
>>>> > > most people are decent human beings and would do the same.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >  On a different argument, since you seem to know well enough how
>>>> some of
>>>> > > the 1% are doing immoral things, why don't you start by handing out
>>>> names
>>>> > > instead of talking air just as the "99%" crowd has been doing up
>>>> till now?
>>>> > >
>>>>  > > *Alan Greenspan, chairman of US Federal Reserve 1987- 2006
>>>> > > **Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England
>>>> > > **Bill Clinton, former US president*
>>>> > > *Gordon Brown, prime minister*
>>>> > > *George W Bush, former US president*
>>>> > > *Senator Phil Gramm
>>>> > > **Abby Cohen, Goldman Sachs chief US strategist
>>>> > > **Kathleen Corbet, former CEO, Standard & Poor's
>>>> > > **"Hank" Greenberg, AIG insurance group
>>>> > > **Andy Hornby, former HBOS boss
>>>> > > **Steve Crawshaw, former B&B boss
>>>> > > **Adam Applegarth, former Northern Rock boss
>>>> > > **Dick Fuld, Lehman Brothers chief executive
>>>> > > **Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin
>>>> > > **Lewis Ranieri
>>>> > > **Joseph Cassano, AIG Financial Products
>>>> > > **Chuck Prince, former Citi boss
>>>> > > **Angelo Mozilo, Countrywide Financial
>>>> > > **Stan O'Neal, former boss of Merrill Lynch*
>>>> > > *Jimmy Cayne, former Bear Stearns boss
>>>> > > **Christopher Dodd, chairman, Senate banking committee (Democrat)
>>>> > > **Geir Haarde, Icelandic prime minister
>>>> > > **John Tiner, FSA chief executive, 2003-07*
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Oh yeah and lets not forget about this guy
>>>> > >
>>>> http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877337,00.html
>>>> > > And while he is thankfully spending time in a prison cell, so many
>>>> other
>>>> > > names on this list go free, in fact a good chunk of them made a
>>>> profit off
>>>> > > of the disaster.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>>
>>>>  > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>  Lets keep the discussion above the belt guys ok?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>  Whats wrong with being skinny? *ducks*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists