[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E98E8CC.3010402@oneechan.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:58:36 -0500
From: Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org>
To: Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [OT] Obama said: "American people understand
that not everybody's been following the rules"
On 10/14/2011 8:21 PM, Christian Sciberras wrote:
> You think I'm biting that?
>
> Skinny and "under-age" is just about everything you could come up
> with. Congrats for creativity.
>
> Just because two of you decided you found common grounds for insult
> doesn't mean you're god-almighty-indisputably-right in every piece of
> shit you come up with. Did I mention it's shit?
>
> With that, I give you one, you have a point, I should have stopped
> responding ever since some guy decided to equate a couple dozen of
> people into America's 1%.
>
> Strange, thought security guys would have been better with numbers...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org
> <mailto:laurelai@...echan.org>> wrote:
>
> On 10/14/2011 6:32 PM, xD 0x41 wrote:
>> Cristiano , per favor' mi dai dieci minuti scusa mi ma, e'
>> essentiale ..
>> You really dont realise how much, you attack others when they
>> post, NOMATTER what the topic... yet you are still wondering why
>> somany people seem to despise your skinny little nerdy ass...
>> well, nerdy isnt bad, but, your a downright lookalike for mr.Bean
>> aka rowan atkinson. You could maybe do his stunts, to ?
>> Your the one who is usually abusing others, before the finality
>> wich is simply adults not reesponding, to the baby whos crying
>> out for more aarguements.
>> You should stfu, and learn more, you assume to know all, in every
>> post, your the brain, yet you are lame, i looked everything up
>> abiout you, and yes, go ahead, and setup a nice wordpress secure
>> setting, php wise to, then yes, id maybe hink your atleast a
>> halfwit ;)
>> Anyhow, your basically a tr0ll, and, you seem to keep goading,
>> even AFTER the others, have completely stopped responding to you,
>> simply because, Laurelai was right, why would anyone want to keep
>> up a thread wich has now turned malign, as i forsaw a week ago,
>> but, i did not think it would even make a week, People like you,
>> keep inspiring the flame to burn brighter.. wich to me, is
>> nastier than any *abuse* names, wich, you clearly have not
>> counted howmany times you have actually called others, some form
>> of rude name/word/personal attack.
>> Maybe when you GROW UP, and behave as an adult, then I would
>> assume the list will start to hear you, even through the bs.
>> Anyhow, i applaud you, for *coming out* as to say, I mean,
>> putting your pic up, like that, mate, you could be a pornstar!
>> what you doin online :P~~~bahahaha
>> go back to grade.2 then repeate it, then move on... then, if you
>> work out how to call 911, call someone who gives a shit.
>> Idiotic kid, grow the hell up.
>> xd--
>>
>> // IND SEC CONSILTANT FOR Yep yep Security (simply coz it sounds
>> good) YEP YEP for all your Hat attire needs!
>>
>> On 15 October 2011 08:57, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429@...il.com
>> <mailto:uuf6429@...il.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, let's just all ignore low insults. The world would be a
>> much better place without them and whoever said them in the
>> first place...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Laurelai
>> <laurelai@...echan.org <mailto:laurelai@...echan.org>> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/14/2011 2:25 PM, Christian Sciberras wrote:
>>> Resorting to personal attacks? Nice.
>>>
>>> Technical skills in what? Running a wordpress blog?
>>> Defacing a website? Growing pot?
>>>
>>> I rarely publicise any materials, most of the time I
>>> just tell whoever is responsible to do a fix.
>>> I'm not really running after publicity, unlike you guys.
>>> Also note that I never said I'm a seasoned hacker... in
>>> fact, my occupation is quite on the opposite side of the
>>> spectrum...
>>>
>>> You also seem to know more than I do what the Ubuntu VM
>>> I have contains.
>>>
>>> But that must make all the difference! I mean, people
>>> that don't know qubits from bits shouldn't be allowed in
>>> such discussions
>>> (of course there's wikipedia...)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Georgi Guninski
>>> <guninski@...inski.com <mailto:guninski@...inski.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Christian Sciberras,
>>>
>>> I have trouble judging your technical skills - all I
>>> have seen is bad smalltalk.
>>>
>>> Do you have any technical publications you can share
>>> so I can judge?
>>>
>>> btw, the best i found was you could could reproduce
>>> a bug in a CMS and in addition you can't tell root
>>> from user password on vanilla ubuntu.
>>>
>>> --
>>> joro
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 02:11:13AM +0200, Christian
>>> Sciberras wrote:
>>> > > So if they cause damage for profit that makes it ok?
>>> >
>>> > No. But it's certainly better than doing damage
>>> without profit. Making
>>> > profit means that at the end of the day, the
>>> money's going to go somewhere
>>> > further in the chain.
>>> > Flattening a tower, for instance, or attacking the
>>> local bank that refused
>>> > to give you a loan because of the time you spent
>>> in a cell, isn't as
>>> > productive.
>>> > Neither is it making a company loose
>>> clients/profit just because they
>>> > decided they don't want you to use their services
>>> (as if you did have a
>>> > right in the first place...).
>>> >
>>> > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a
>>> measure of responsibility
>>> > in the situation too, human beings are by nature
>>> imperfect, but the largest
>>> > share of responsibility lies with the names listed
>>> below.
>>> >
>>> > The largest share? I can see Ex-president Bush
>>> trying to sell you a bottle
>>> > of beer for $10 dollars ($7 profit). Wait, I can't.
>>> >
>>> > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid
>>> back every dime of it,
>>> > most people are decent human beings and would do
>>> the same.
>>> >
>>> > Most people? I could have sworn 90% of the people
>>> in the NYC subway would
>>> > thank $deity if you suddenly dropped dead so they
>>> could get things off you.
>>> > Call me cynical, but I wouldn't trust anyone else
>>> in such cases, other than
>>> > myself.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regarding that list of yours, great! Now we just
>>> need a little more effort.
>>> > For each of those persons, please enlighten us as
>>> to what they did legally
>>> > wrong.
>>> > Of course, the people that landed in jail
>>> shouldn't be counted. The "99%
>>> > protest" is a modern one committed to change, it
>>> just can't right wrongs by
>>> > pointing at jailed people.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Laurelai
>>> <laurelai@...echan.org
>>> <mailto:laurelai@...echan.org>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > On 10/13/2011 9:18 AM, Christian Sciberras wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > I simply acknowledge the fact that some people
>>> work hard to get "obscenely
>>> > > rich", but I just can't stand people that cause
>>> damage for the fun of it.
>>> > >
>>> > > So if they cause damage for profit that makes
>>> it ok?
>>> > >
>>> > > Yes, I stick for everyone that minds his
>>> business, instead of ruining
>>> > > others' for the fun of it.
>>> > >
>>> > > What bothers me is the fact that those
>>> hypocrites (protesters) are crying
>>> > > out loud against some people they're highly
>>> envious of with the excuse of
>>> > > "the depression".
>>> > > Well, here's the news; the famous depression has
>>> been brought about by
>>> > > these same people!
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a
>>> measure of responsibility
>>> > > in the situation too, human beings are by nature
>>> imperfect, but the largest
>>> > > share of responsibility lies with the names
>>> listed below.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > If someone above is collecting free money
>>> because of incentives for
>>> > > people to spend money (and which seem to work
>>> well), I can't blame him.
>>> > >
>>> > > Yes because trickle down theory worked *so* well
>>> > >
>>> > > How many times in your life have you paid back
>>> something you received by
>>> > > mistake and which wasn't yours?
>>> > > While I would foremost applaud anyone that would
>>> right such a wrong, I just
>>> > > can't ignore the fact that those people out
>>> there representing the "99%" are
>>> > > big-time hypocrites.
>>> > >
>>> > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid
>>> back every dime of it,
>>> > > most people are decent human beings and would do
>>> the same.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On a different argument, since you seem to know
>>> well enough how some of
>>> > > the 1% are doing immoral things, why don't you
>>> start by handing out names
>>> > > instead of talking air just as the "99%" crowd
>>> has been doing up till now?
>>> > >
>>> > > *Alan Greenspan, chairman of US Federal Reserve
>>> 1987- 2006
>>> > > **Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England
>>> > > **Bill Clinton, former US president*
>>> > > *Gordon Brown, prime minister*
>>> > > *George W Bush, former US president*
>>> > > *Senator Phil Gramm
>>> > > **Abby Cohen, Goldman Sachs chief US strategist
>>> > > **Kathleen Corbet, former CEO, Standard & Poor's
>>> > > **"Hank" Greenberg, AIG insurance group
>>> > > **Andy Hornby, former HBOS boss
>>> > > **Steve Crawshaw, former B&B boss
>>> > > **Adam Applegarth, former Northern Rock boss
>>> > > **Dick Fuld, Lehman Brothers chief executive
>>> > > **Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin
>>> > > **Lewis Ranieri
>>> > > **Joseph Cassano, AIG Financial Products
>>> > > **Chuck Prince, former Citi boss
>>> > > **Angelo Mozilo, Countrywide Financial
>>> > > **Stan O'Neal, former boss of Merrill Lynch*
>>> > > *Jimmy Cayne, former Bear Stearns boss
>>> > > **Christopher Dodd, chairman, Senate banking
>>> committee (Democrat)
>>> > > **Geir Haarde, Icelandic prime minister
>>> > > **John Tiner, FSA chief executive, 2003-07*
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Oh yeah and lets not forget about this guy
>>> > >
>>> http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877337,00.html
>>> > > And while he is thankfully spending time in a
>>> prison cell, so many other
>>> > > names on this list go free, in fact a good chunk
>>> of them made a profit off
>>> > > of the disaster.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> > Charter:
>>> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Lets keep the discussion above the belt guys ok?
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter:http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia -http://secunia.com/
> Whats wrong with being skinny? *ducks*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
I was actually talking to Xd as im rather skinny myself :s
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists