full-disclosure - Re: Facebook Attach EXE Vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC9YSs5X1z6geGRtg6eSMVwrDHP=hkCz7akazU1r4cERg1_qxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:19:50 -0400
From: Peter Dawson <slash.pd@...il.com>
To: Pablo Ximenes <pablo@...en.es>
Cc: Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Facebook Attach EXE Vulnerability

oh ok..i c ur point.. if they did tell him to wait and he failed their NDA..
then its an issue

/pd


On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Pablo Ximenes <pablo@...en.es> wrote:

>  Agreed. What I'm asking is whether Facebook did ask him to wait. Did it?
> If it did it's a whole different ball game.
>
>
> Pablo Ximenes
> http://ximen.es/
> http://twitter.com/pabloximenes
>
> Em 28/10/2011, às 13:01, Peter Dawson <slash.pd@...il.com> escreveu:
>
>    I dont  think that he waited for vendor to confirm fix in production
> and I dont see a reason that he needs to wait . If FB did not ask him to
> refrain from disclosure.. y shld  he ?
>
> 09/30/2011 Reported Vulnerability to the Vendor
> 10/26/2011 Vendor Acknowledged Vulnerability
> 10/27/2011 Publicly Disclosed
>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/