lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8k-QVwRV1AqHdNMyLCfgd2ySV3+HNLJFb6aU8ALaYpvkw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:25:15 -0400 From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com> To: Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu Subject: Re: Facebook Attach EXE Vulnerability On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org> wrote: > On 10/28/2011 10:03 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 20:44:04 CDT, Laurelai said: >>> On 10/28/2011 6:17 PM, Ulises2k wrote: >>>> You know this? ;) >>>> https://www.facebook.com/whitehat/bounty/ >>> Facebook has a habit of ignoring issues >> So? That's their problem, not yours. >> >> The moral thing to do is to work with them on a responsible disclosure in hopes >> of a bounty. Then when it becomes apparent they intend to ignore the issue, >> you've at least tried to do the right thing - so publish and at least score >> some reputation points. ;) >> >> Of course, the devil is in the details - for instance, how long is it "responsible" >> to wait if you discover a zero-day that's already being exploited on a large >> scale? > When we informed facebook of our discovery ( not this one another one) > they ignored us and when asked by the media they denied it was even a > problem, I wonder how many people actually have cashed in on that bounty > they offered? Its funny how that works in practice..... _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists