full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:57:05 -0500
From: Gary Baribault <gary@...ibault.net>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP
 Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

Talk is indeed cheap!

Gary B

On 11/11/2011 11:43 AM, Ryan Dewhurst wrote:
> I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what I
> was thinking at least.
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <jon.kertz@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> wrote:
>>> About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit, 49days
>>> to send a packet, my butt.
>>> There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with
>>> seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only
>>> has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger
>>> vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like
>>> somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks...
>>> and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src
>>> so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to
>>> you but thats better way to make it work, this will open
>>> sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the goal
>>> is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so ,
>>> iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3
>>> nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered with
>>> ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one thing,
>>> and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another..
>> I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either
>> with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know
>> what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from
>> what I can make of your writing).
>>
>> No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you
>> are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/