full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCvwp7LUqV9AZzgTACE8kgWErdVdwPALZRn5OO41BO-h=UT5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:29:58 +1100
From: xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com>
To: Dan Ballance <tzewang.dorje@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP
 Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

Would scapy be a suitable tool to attempt this kind of packet
manipulation with? I'm a programmer, but I'm new to this kind of
network/packet-level/security scripting.


Yes, scapy + impacket./..would probably help u with the python side...


On 12 November 2011 04:04, Dan Ballance <tzewang.dorje@...il.com> wrote:
> Would scapy be a suitable tool to attempt this kind of packet manipulation
> with? I'm a programmer, but I'm new to this kind of
> network/packet-level/security scripting.
> What tools / frameworks / languages etc do you guys use to write these kinds
> of exploit scripts?
> cheers,
> dan :)
> (keep forgetting I need to reply-all on this list)
> On 11 November 2011 17:01, Mario Vilas <mvilas@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> I liked the "heavy breather in the perv closet" bit.
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Ryan Dewhurst <ryandewhurst@...il.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what I
>>> was thinking at least.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <jon.kertz@...il.com> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> wrote:
>>> >> About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit, 49days
>>> >> to send a packet, my butt.
>>> >> There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with
>>> >> seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only
>>> >> has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger
>>> >> vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like
>>> >> somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks...
>>> >> and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src
>>> >> so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to
>>> >> you but thats better way to make it work, this will open
>>> >> sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the goal
>>> >> is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so ,
>>> >> iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3
>>> >> nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered with
>>> >> ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one thing,
>>> >> and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another..
>>> >
>>> > I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either
>>> > with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know
>>> > what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from
>>> > what I can make of your writing).
>>> >
>>> > No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you
>>> > are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD.
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> “There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights
>> the enemy of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When
>> the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the
>> people.”
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/