full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:42:58 -0800
From: Antony widmal <antony.widmal@...il.com>
To: secn3t@...il.com
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP
 Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

You are definitely a lamer secn3t.
Also for you little brain, impacket has nothing to do with crafting UDP
packets..

Thanks for proving this again and again.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:36 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> wrote:

> well look at that :P
> not same author but , nice coding predelka! good one, i will add you
> to crazycoders.com coderslist... i guess there is a few codes you have
> now done wich might be useful... cheers.
> xd
>
>
>
> On 12 November 2011 05:43, Ryan Dewhurst <ryandewhurst@...il.com> wrote:
> > An attempt at a possible MS11-083 DoS/PoC exploit, by @hackerfantastic:
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/fjZ1k0fi
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Thor (Hammer of God)
> > <thor@...merofgod.com> wrote:
> >> Yeah, I gotta say, I’m going to use it at some point ;)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
> >> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On Behalf Of Mario
> Vilas
> >> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 9:02 AM
> >> To: Ryan Dewhurst
> >>
> >> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
> >> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP
> >> Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I liked the "heavy breather in the perv closet" bit.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Ryan Dewhurst <ryandewhurst@...il.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what I
> >> was thinking at least.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <jon.kertz@...il.com> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com> wrote:
> >>>> About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit, 49days
> >>>> to send a packet, my butt.
> >>>> There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with
> >>>> seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only
> >>>> has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger
> >>>> vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like
> >>>> somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks...
> >>>> and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src
> >>>> so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to
> >>>> you but thats better way to make it work, this will open
> >>>> sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the goal
> >>>> is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so ,
> >>>> iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3
> >>>> nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered with
> >>>> ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one thing,
> >>>> and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another..
> >>>
> >>> I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either
> >>> with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know
> >>> what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from
> >>> what I can make of your writing).
> >>>
> >>> No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you
> >>> are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD.
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> “There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights
> the enemy
> >> of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When
> the military
> >> becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.”
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/