full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:41:28 +1100
From: xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com>
To: baqstabz <baqstabz@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP
 Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

Received: from [127.0.0.1]
(host86-160-211-44.range86-160.btcentralplus.com. [86.160.211.44])

to bad eh...



On 12 November 2011 13:42, baqstabz <baqstabz@...il.com> wrote:
> Judging by your posts I would go out on the edge and say that you have about
> as much chance of having 0-day (yes, that is including xxs) as your mommy.
> face it lol
>
> Now please, stfu son, you're sounding like a total tardlump; otherwise we
> will have to unleash the dragons and let you see what a 10k botnet feels
> like.
>
>
> On 11/11/2011 23:26, xD 0x41 wrote:
>>
>> Indeeed.
>> Seeing how the wolves are, i ceertainly would bnot release it.
>> i am only saying, I am using cpp, and windows, and, the exploit
>> bypasses all protections, but, since you guys dont have the actual
>> real poc for it, i guess, i would not be saying anything more, and,
>> ill be leaving it, for the proper poc author, to make that choice,
>> wich, personally, i would never handout to a bunch of disrepectful
>> people, as i see, when this is, nothing, i habve held onto, atleast 2
>> GOOd MS 0days for years, you rally think, i will handout the right way
>> todo this ?
>> pfft..   yer right, lets go hand everyone the ms bug :PP ofc, why
>> would i ever not want a 10 k botnet up in a day...  hell yea!
>> i would neverm, give more about this, on this topic, because, i have
>> seen how people are now on this list and, saddens me that half of you
>> do not have a brain. unfortunately..and, saince i dont wish to break
>> any deals made with ms etc, then, i cannot say anything, i dont know,
>> why this is hard to understand..and, i will NOT handout a working
>> scanner, regardless...
>> and, believe it, it does NOT take 49days atall to exploit... theres
>> alot, you dont know..yet.
>>
>> dont ask me further, please.
>> i should never have even said anything, again, i wont make that
>> mistake again, the proof, will as always be n the pudding...
>> later.
>>
>>
>> On 12 November 2011 10:17, Michal Zalewski<lcamtuf@...edump.cx>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> next time, i wont say shit, and, believe it.
>>>
>>> Well it's just that the attack you are describing will be thwarted by
>>> setting a sticky bit on /tmp, and you have not demonstrated otherwise.
>>>
>>> /mz
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/