lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALo60KkF5OSEAPGSZpX1QFPye3rsStGVREVGZht+Jmw1+87q5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:44:04 -0800
From: Antony widmal <antony.widmal@...il.com>
To: secn3t@...il.com, 
	"full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP
 Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

Nop. Im in your mom's bedroom,walk up the stairs you will hear us..
Le 11 nov. 2011 19:57, "xD 0x41" <secn3t@...il.com> a écrit :
>
> another fuck who hides :)
>
>
> On 12 November 2011 14:51, Antony widmal <antony.widmal@...il.com> wrote:
> > Typical S-K behavior; talk about stuff he has nfi.
> >
> > Le 11 nov. 2011 19:15, "xD 0x41" <secn3t@...il.com> a écrit :
> >>
> >> 0day for ms, is not so hard, and, i hjave already explained one of
> >> them to some people
> >>
> >> 0day for ms, is not so hard, and, i hjave already explained one of
> >> them to some people :)
> >> but, i dont care, because, you dont have it, and, i do.
> >> so, many people have 0days...whats wrong with this ? i found my own,
> >> and, thats why i am happy to keep them. and, as i said, one, i have
> >> discussed and, made a working scanner binary for.. so, i guess that
> >> much, some people do know is true...
> >> so, thats not rare atall.. you want to wonder about just wibndows,
> >> imagine linux... and, there is , the imagination, is big there and
> >> there is plenty and plenty of attacks still available on fully patched
> >> NON grsec kernels :)
> >> and yes, i have 0days of those, also.
> >> enjoy.some get lucky, others just...suck..
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12 November 2011 13:42, baqstabz <baqstabz@...il.com> wrote:
> >> > Judging by your posts I would go out on the edge and say that you
have
> >> > about
> >> > as much chance of having 0-day (yes, that is including xxs) as your
> >> > mommy.
> >> > face it lol
> >> >
> >> > Now please, stfu son, you're sounding like a total tardlump;
otherwise
> >> > we
> >> > will have to unleash the dragons and let you see what a 10k botnet
feels
> >> > like.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 11/11/2011 23:26, xD 0x41 wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Indeeed.
> >> >> Seeing how the wolves are, i ceertainly would bnot release it.
> >> >> i am only saying, I am using cpp, and windows, and, the exploit
> >> >> bypasses all protections, but, since you guys dont have the actual
> >> >> real poc for it, i guess, i would not be saying anything more, and,
> >> >> ill be leaving it, for the proper poc author, to make that choice,
> >> >> wich, personally, i would never handout to a bunch of disrepectful
> >> >> people, as i see, when this is, nothing, i habve held onto, atleast
2
> >> >> GOOd MS 0days for years, you rally think, i will handout the right
way
> >> >> todo this ?
> >> >> pfft..   yer right, lets go hand everyone the ms bug :PP ofc, why
> >> >> would i ever not want a 10 k botnet up in a day...  hell yea!
> >> >> i would neverm, give more about this, on this topic, because, i have
> >> >> seen how people are now on this list and, saddens me that half of
you
> >> >> do not have a brain. unfortunately..and, saince i dont wish to break
> >> >> any deals made with ms etc, then, i cannot say anything, i dont
know,
> >> >> why this is hard to understand..and, i will NOT handout a working
> >> >> scanner, regardless...
> >> >> and, believe it, it does NOT take 49days atall to exploit... theres
> >> >> alot, you dont know..yet.
> >> >>
> >> >> dont ask me further, please.
> >> >> i should never have even said anything, again, i wont make that
> >> >> mistake again, the proof, will as always be n the pudding...
> >> >> later.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On 12 November 2011 10:17, Michal Zalewski<lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
 wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> next time, i wont say shit, and, believe it.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Well it's just that the attack you are describing will be thwarted
by
> >> >>> setting a sticky bit on /tmp, and you have not demonstrated
otherwise.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> /mz
> >> >>>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ