full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:07:56 +0000
From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@...merofgod.com>
To: Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP
 Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

>You mad bro?

If by "mad" you mean "crazy," well, you're not the only one asking that question these days :)  If by mad you mean "angry," then I'd have to say "yes."  Well, angry is too strong a term - I would say "frustrated."  Information Security is supposed to be about just that - but we've stopped talking about that.  We talk about information *insecurity*.  What frustrates me is that everyone thinks there is some value to pointing out how bad everyone else's mistakes are, yet it doesn't seem like anyone is actually suggesting ways of fixing things. 

I could go on, but I think I said it best here:

http://syngress.com/phishwrap/july-2011-phishwrap/security-theater/

t

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/