[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCvwp4d_+NU7OPum1pz3mEVD8H+pQaGqbUiBvCTEWQRfjGVQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 06:27:06 +1100
From: xD 0x41 <secn3t@...il.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default
I think T is right about you mate, you do a hell alot of talking crap,
without actually moving.. like, do you ever move away from your inbox
?
Your a shame on linux worls valdis, picking on ubuntu, go pick on Owl
OS , a 'security' based os...Ubuntu is for beginners, nuff said.
useless mofo.
XD
On 19 November 2011 00:04, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:24:36 +0100, Mario Vilas said:
>> Let's not overreact. We're talking about a guest account only on dekstop
>> systems, for local login only, and perfectly visible to the user. The only
>> problem I see here is not having a simple GUI way to disable the guest
>> login for a non tech-savvy user, but no more. (Or am I missing something
>> here?)
>
> Given that Ubuntu is an African word for "Can't configure Debian", and the
> target audience of Ubuntu, the lack of the simple GUI is surprising...
>
> (Yes, there's still one config setting saving your butt in sshd_config - but
> for a distro that wraps a Teletubby interface around freaking /bin/su so you
> don't accidentally hurt yourself, the fact that there's exactly one config file
> setting saving your butt if you manage to enable inbound ssh seems a bit of an
> oversight).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists