full-disclosure - Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCvwp5ukcQjDRwEc1Wf+1w3hiLvOR8TnB-1defNHKWJd2zRag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:23:02 +1100
From: GloW - XD <doomxd@...il.com>
To: root <root_@...ertel.com.ar>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default

Recently some stupid people got into management (as always happens)

Oh here your right, but you still can relent, just dont fucking use
the os wich sucks, i have learnt that this suually dictates how an os
gets put tyogether... or no.... tajke some lessons out of windows
even,. but do it smarter... idc, id never put ubuntu on a prod, OR
local box, It got me once with the APC mags promo about how cooool ubu
is, then i found there is only about 100 bad binarys, your almost
there now, only 30 or so togo! almost patched dude! tyhe biggest laugh
is, your main binary wich is simplest, is vulnerable to suid attack...
i guess some people would know this method, and know what i am talking
about.. if not badluck.

Now, adding in a known MS flawed user... well, whats stopping it from
taking out lamest fucking os of year award... nothing. clean
management, and clean your 3rd party addons, then ill maybe consider
even using it partially again.
It sucks, simple, gimme user ax to your ubuntu, so i can rape it. thx :)

On 19 November 2011 18:14, root <root_@...ertel.com.ar> wrote:
> On 11/18/2011 11:01 AM, Darren Martyn wrote:
>> To be honest, while Ubuntu is hardly secure, it is not DESIGNED to be
>> secure per se. It is designed to wean Windows users away from M$ and toward
>> GNU/Linux OS types. Kind of a "Linux for newbs". My family went from Win XP
>> to Ubuntu years ago and stuck with it. I moved on to Debian, they stuck to
>> Ubuntu and Win7 (eventually) as they are not computer enthusiasts - mere
>> users.
>
> Bullshit, Ubuntu is designed (or at least, was designed) to be very
> secure, check all the stuff it comes by default:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Security/Features
>
> Not even the default Debian kernel has all those features activated. If
> I'm wrong, why you see metasploit modules for Debian but not for Ubuntu?
> that's the reason.
>
> Recently some stupid people got into management (as always happens) and
> we have things like unity, the fucked up 24-bit ASLR in i386, and this
> guest account for retards.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/