[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111123154430.22675ohpktz72n6m@mail.funkymunkey.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:44:30 +0000
From: charlie@...kymunkey.com
To: dave bl <db.pub.mail@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default
I suppose the real question is, what is more important, that its linux
or that its secure by default...?
Quoting dave bl <db.pub.mail@...il.com>:
> On 23 November 2011 21:37, <charlie@...kymunkey.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If you can't, maybe you can name other, more secure Linux distro in
>>> which your 10 ways do not work.
>>
>> OpenBSD? :P
>
> What a great choice for a secure linux distribution ;)
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists