full-disclosure - Re: Is FD no longer unmoderated?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4064.1322708772@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:06:12 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: David Blanc <davidblanc1975@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Is FD no longer unmoderated?

On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 07:49:28 +0530, David Blanc said:
> A colleague of mine subscribed to FD recently and tried posting to it
> but every time he gets this message:

n3td3v, is that your sock puppet? :)

The *list* isn't moderated.  However, several *people* are, and they for the
most part know who they are and why they're moderated.

(And no, I'm not one of the list moderators, nor do I have any real influence with
those that are)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/