full-disclosure - Re: Google open redirect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABgawubpGg0PM0VGrzkKgJRgXTvTNi00-UVKjpQi1BCLMrHQdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 10:06:08 -0500
From: Charles Morris <cmorris@...odu.edu>
To: Pablo Ximenes <pablo@...en.es>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Google open redirect

Granted, but I know that vulnerability research can take a huge chunk
of time out of a person's life,
and without getting in to "monetary philosophy", I feel that in our
current system, a person should
be compensated for their time if they've done something useful for society.
That's sort of the point of the way we use money.

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Pablo Ximenes <pablo@...en.es> wrote:
> I think the reward is intended as a symbolic token of appreciation, and not
> as compensation. That's why they give you the option to donate your cash
> reward instead of keeping the money. I think what really drives researchers
> into Google's program is recognition and not compensation, IMHO.
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/