full-disclosure - Re: Google open redirect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:46:49 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Pablo Ximenes <pablo@...en.es>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, Charles Morris <cmorris@...odu.edu>
Subject: Re: Google open redirect

On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 14:24:21 -0300, Pablo Ximenes said:
> 2011/12/8 Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@...edump.cx>
> > If you don't like it, let us know how to improve it. You also always
> > have the option of not researching vulnerabilities in these platforms;
> > going with the full-disclosure approach; or selling the flaws to a
> > willing third party.

> Well, selling flaws to third parties might be considered a crime in some
> places, so I would be cautious with that approach.

I suspect a large portion of the people who are selling flaws to third parties
are not at all concerned about whether selling the flaw is a crime, as often the
bigger question is how many crimes were committed in the discovery process...

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/