full-disclosure - Re: OT: Firefox question / poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <100472.1324654444@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:34:04 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: 夜神　岩男 <supergiantpotato@...oo.co.jp>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: OT: Firefox question / poll

On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:32:38 +0900, =?UTF-8?B?5aSc56We44CA5bKp55S3?= said:

> To begin with, most people click through the DANGER SCREEN warnings
> about bad TLS certificates. With this in mind it is obvious that a
> developer can't expect the average browser-using population to even know
> what a script is.

In another thread on another list yesterday, Steve Bellovin said:

> See the definition of "dialog box" at http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/Glossary

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/