full-disclosure - Re: Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJVRA1SgvexJF9WZHEL=MCOGUTNX8Ph+xg2asTErHp95KqJzkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:48:03 -0800
From: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
To: Kyle Creyts <kyle.creyts@...il.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Fwd: Rate Stratfor's Incident Response

On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Kyle Creyts <kyle.creyts@...il.com> wrote:
> I would also like to point out that "finding the bugs" is not the  same as
> "fixing the bugs," and that for all the focus that is placed on finding
> them, and lauding the people that do, fixing them is usually pretty
> thankless.

finding the bugs before a product or service is released is also
thankless. as is verifying that bugs are never re-introduced due to
carelessness or oversight.

implementing with robustness, vs. implementing with haste, also
thwarted & thankless pursuit in these times.

not a gap in knowledge or skill, but a gap in practice that dooms
infosec so many places.

> I think shifting that dynamic would be more rewarding if
> "advancing the state of the industry" is really what is valued.

keep up the good fight, sir!
  ... and don't hold your breath.
    ;)

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/