lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:15:03 +0000 From: Full Disclosure mailing list <fulldisclosure@...esys.com> To: RandallM <randallm@...mail.com> Cc: funsec <funsec@...uxbox.org>, full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: can you answer this? On 03/02/2012 08:20, RandallM wrote: > since no one could answer the last one how bout this. In my FW log > Trust (our 10.0.0.0. network) to untrust picked this up: > > 2012-02-02 10:08:10 7.254.254.254:68 7.254.254.255:67 0.0.0.0:0 > 0.0.0.0:0 DHCP 0 sec. 0 0 Traffic Denied > > My "any" to "any" denied queue. > > I've seen this sort of thing before, from misconfigured VPNs. Do you have someone using "Tunngle" on your network? It's a VPN product (as far as I understand it, primarily for gaming), and it appears to (mis)use the 7.xxx.xxx.xxx IP address space. See this for a report of similar packet sightings: http://www.tunngle.net/community/topic/18311-bsod/ My guess is that one of your users has set up this VPN in order to tunnel through your firewall, but it's not configured correctly and its DHCP requests are going onto your main network rather than (as intended) through the tunnel. You might want to look into who is using this... Granville Moore Nemesys Computer Consultants www.nemesys.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists