lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F315798.1020107@vulnerability-lab.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:55:52 +0100
From: "research@...nerability-lab.com" <research@...nerability-lab.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: HITB2011KUL - Post Memory Corruption Analysis

Title:
======
HITB2011KUL - Post Memory Corruption Analysis


Date:
=====
2012-01-26


References:
===========
Download:	http://www.vulnerability-lab.com/resources/videos/398.wmv
View: 		http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOgarD9KCbg



VL-ID:
=====
398


Status:
========
Published


Exploitation-Technique:
=======================
Conference


Severity:
=========
High


Details:
========
In this presentation, we introduce a new exploitation methodology of invalid memory reads and writes, 
based on dataflow analysis after a memory corruption bug has occured inside a running process.

We will expose a methodology which shall help with writing a reliable exploit out of a PoC triggering 
an invalid memory write, in presence of security defense mechanism such as compiler enhancements 
(full RELRO, SSP) or kernel anti exploitation features (ASLR, NX).

In particular, we will demonstrate how to:

- Find all the function pointers inside a running process
- How to determine which ones would have been dereferenced after the crash
- Which ones are truncable (in particular with 0×00000000).

If case all of the above fail, how to test for specific locations overwrites in order to indirectly 
trigger a second vulnerability allowing greater control and eventually control flow hijacking. All of 
the above without source code, indeed ;)

In the case of invalid memory reads, we will exemplify how to indirectly influence the control flow of 
execution by reading arbitrary values, how to trace all the unaligned memory access and how to test if 
an invalid read can be turned into an invalid write or used to infer the mapping of the binary. We will 
also introduce a new debugging technique which allows for very effective testing of all of the above 
by forcing the debugged process to fork(). Automatically. And with a rating of the best read/write 
location based on probabilities of mapping addresses (because of ASLR). 


Credits:
========
Jonathan is a security research engineer holding an Engineering degree and a Master in Artificial Intelligence. 
Born in France, he’s been living in Brazil and India, before currently working in Australia. With about 15 years 
of practice of assembly, he is specialised in low level security, from raw sockets to cryptography and memory corruption bugs.

He has been credited for the discovery of complex vulnerabilities in cryptographic software (eg: Microsoft 
Bitlocker, Truecrypt, and most BIOS software of the market including HP, Intel or Toshiba ones most notably), 
mainstream software (Opera web browser, adobe reader, top tiers antivirus softwares) and Virtualization 
software. He is currently working as Senior Security Consultant and CEO at the Toucan System security company 
(http://www.toucan-system.com). His clients count some of the biggest Defense and Financial Institutions worldwide.

Jonathan is also the co-organiser of the Hackito Ergo Sum conference (HES2011) in France. Jonathan has been a 
speaker at a number of great intenational conferences including Blackhat, Defcon, HITB (Amsterdam & Kuala Lumpur), 
Ruxcon (Australia), Hackito Ergo Sum (France), and is a recurrent speaker at H2HC (Brazil & Mexico). 


Disclaimer:
===========
The information provided in this video is provided as it is without any warranty. Vulnerability-Lab disclaims all warranties, 
either expressed or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and capability for a particular purpose. Vulnerability-
Lab or its suppliers are not liable in any case of damage, including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential loss of business 
profits or special damages, even if Vulnerability-Lab or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Some 
states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages so the foregoing limitation 
may not apply. Any modified copy or reproduction, including partially usages, of this file requires authorization from Vulnerability-
Lab. Permission to electronically redistribute this alert in its unmodified form is granted. All other rights, including the use of 
other media, are reserved by Vulnerability-Lab or its suppliers.

    						Copyright © 2012|Vulnerability-Lab




-- 
Website: www.vulnerability-lab.com ; vuln-lab.com or vuln-db.com
Contact: admin@...nerability-lab.com or support@...nerability-lab.com


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ