full-disclosure - Re: Linksys Routers still Vulnerable to Wps vulnerability.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAG5DJwechAngb6LfY1=Nv1rWn44-DeGo1PDCXM2KGj-NMth34w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:00:02 -0800
From: "Zach C." <fxchip@...il.com>
To: Dan Kaminsky <dan@...para.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Linksys Routers still Vulnerable to Wps
	vulnerability.

Solution: use DD-WRT? Or is that vulnerable too? (Or are there worse
problems? :))
On Feb 10, 2012 10:12 AM, "Dan Kaminsky" <dan@...para.com> wrote:

> "Fixing a vulnerability like this with all the bureoucratic, QA and legal
> process wouldn't take no more than 2 weeks"
>
> If bureaucratic, QA, and legal issues emerge, you can't even get the names
> of the people you need to speak to in less than 2 weeks, let alone schedule
> a conference call. Fixing?  Heh.
>
> Aside from rate limiting WPS, there isn't much of a fix, and you can't
> turn it off either.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 10, 2012, at 2:40 AM, farthvader@...h.ai wrote:
>
> Don't buy Linksys Routers they are vulnerable to Wifi unProtected Setup
> Pin registrar Brute force attack.
> No patch or workaround exist at the making of this post.
>
> Vulnerable list and alleged patch availability:
> source:http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/ukp.aspx?vw=1&articleid=25154
>
>  E1000      To Be Disclosed (aka we don't have idea)
>  E1000 v2      To Be Disclosed
>  E1000 v2.1      To Be Disclosed
>  E1200 v1     early March
>  E1200 v2     early March
>  E1500     early March
>  E1550     mid March
>  E2000     To Be Disclosed
>  E2100L     mid March
>  E2500     early March
>  E3000     To Be Disclosed
>  E3200     early March
>  E4200 v1     early March
>  E4200 v2     To Be Disclosed
>  M10     To Be Disclosed
>  M20     To Be Disclosed
>  M20 v2     To Be Disclosed
>  RE1000     early March
>  WAG120N     To Be Disclosed
>  WAG160N     To Be Disclosed
>  WAG160N v2     To Be Disclosed
>  WAG310G     To Be Disclosed
>  WAG320N     To Be Disclosed
>  WAG54G2     To Be Disclosed
>  WAP610N     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT110     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT120N     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT160N v1     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT160N v2     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT160N v3     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT160NL     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT310N v1     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT310N v2     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT320N     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT400N     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT54G2 v1     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT54G2 v1.3     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT54G2 v1.5     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT54GS2 v1     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT610N v1     To Be Disclosed
>  WRT610N v2     To Be Disclosed
>  X2000     To Be Disclosed
>  X2000 v2     To Be Disclosed
>  X3000     To Be Disclosed
>
> The question is why a big company like Cisco/Linksys didn't release a
> patch since almost 1 month and a half ?.
>
> Well i have circumstantial evidence that Cisco outsource some of their
> Linksys firmware routers to other companies (Arcadyan for example.) in some
> cases source code is only available through NDA's or not available at all.
> That's why they are taking so long to release a fix to the WPS
> vulnerability. Fixing a vulnerability like this with all the bureoucratic,
> QA and legal process wouldn't take no more than 2 weeks. I found some GPL
> violations by the way but this is beyond the scope of this message
> (obfuscating firmware it's useless you now).
>
> I apologize if i offended someone but IT security it's serious business
> specially if someone use your wifi to commit crimes.
> This vulnerability contains public and very easy to use exploit code, it's
> not a Denial of Service.
>
>
> Farth Vader.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/