full-disclosure - Re: Linksys Routers still Vulnerable to Wps vulnerability.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAApuFLe48c5tpXFZMNrhLMgK-PENfAd8Wn_bNsPk1Bs8VSmLTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:13:07 -0700
From: chris nelson <sleekmountaincat@...il.com>
To: Dan Kaminsky <dan@...para.com>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Linksys Routers still Vulnerable to Wps
	vulnerability.

also here:  http://www.backtrack-linux.org/forums/showthread.php?t=47038  and
here:
http://adaywithtape.blogspot.com/2012/01/cracking-wpa-using-wps-vulnerability.html


On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:09 PM, chris nelson <sleekmountaincat@...il.com>wrote:

> i believe that disabling wps on router still leaves some routers
> vulnerable was reported on before.
> from
> http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2012/01/hands-on-hacking-wifi-protected-setup-with-reaver.ars
> "Having demonstrated the insecurity of WPS, I went into the Linksys'
> administrative interface and turned WPS off. Then, I relaunched Reaver,
> figuring that surely setting the router to manual configuration would block
> the attacks at the door. But apparently Reaver didn't get the memo, and the
> Linksys' WPS interface still responded to its queries—once again coughing
> up the password and SSID. "
>
> the testing i did was in early-mid jan, ill verify my findings again. at
> work now, but will let you know about config methods.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Dan Kaminsky <dan@...para.com> wrote:
>
>> That's a fairly significant finding.  Can anyone else confirm the
>> existence of devices that still fall to Reaver even when WPS is disabled?
>>
>> Chris, when you run:
>>
>> iw scan wlan0 | grep “Config methods”
>>
>> Do you see a difference in advertised methods?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:58 PM, chris nelson <sleekmountaincat@...il.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> i have tested reaver on a netgear and linksys (dont have model nos. with
>>> me) with wps disabled and enabled. the wps setting did not matter and both
>>> were vulnerable. was able to recover wpa2 passphrase in ~4 hrs on both.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Dan Kaminsky <dan@...para.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Steve while he's often derided goes into this very well.  Many cisco's
>>>>> only stop advertising wps when it is "off" but wps actually still
>>>>> exists...which means they are still easily hackable.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Have you directly confirmed a WPS exchange can occur even on devices
>>>> that aren't advertising support?  That would indeed be a quick and dirty
>>>> way to "turn the feature off".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/