full-disclosure - Re: Fwd: [Webappsec] Call for Assistance: OWASP Virtual Patching Survey

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJVRA1S3-55Y3zzzAaXCYCXuRjwoSWUH0j+jOGdoR7FDsME+NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:33:02 -0800
From: coderman <coderman@...il.com>
To: noloader@...il.com
Cc: FunSec List <funsec@...uxbox.org>,
	Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Webappsec] Call for Assistance: OWASP
 Virtual Patching Survey

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@...il.com> wrote:
> From the folks at OWASP. Please take a moment to provide feedback if
> you have helpful comments.

i see your survey contained many reasons for using virtual patching,
none of which included: "Haste: virtual patches can be deployed
extremely quickly relative to any other remediation technique."

who wrote this survey?

i am disappoint.  ಠ_ಠ

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/