full-disclosure - Re: The Mystery of the Duqu Framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPGeVWNeKX+FR1XHc-43x30pTVkm-p8Hu1AJNRhnWLF2tEa-wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:36:50 -0700
From: Sanguinarious Rose <SanguineRose@...ultusTerra.com>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: The Mystery of the Duqu Framework

Trying to cover up you being "told", that's Cute <3

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org> wrote:
> On 3/10/2012 4:31 AM, Sanguinarious Rose wrote:
>
> Not really, it looks like speculation same as I just admitted my idea
> was. There is no proof as of yet besides for just a single tweet
> suggesting an idea much in the same mine just was. Unless someone does
> the proper research into it, it is just that, 140 chars speculation.
>
> Told [x]
> Not Told [ ]
>
> umad?
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Laurelai <laurelai@...echan.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/10/2012 4:13 AM, Sanguinarious Rose wrote:
>
> Yea, I have been thinking on ideas for that as well, I see no one has
> thought outside the box yet.
>
> I would look into OO'ed C (www.planetpdf.com/codecuts/pdfs/ooc.pdf) as
> being a possibility. Long before in the time when the mighty C++ was
> young, it was translated to C code for compilation. I have not had the
> time to dig into it yet to see how you could code it in OO C style
> code yet. You can implement much of the functionality of OO parts of
> C++ including virtual functions and other things.
>
> Well, these are my thoughts on it. More speculation at the moment but
> might be of use to someone.
>
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:51 AM,  <fd@...erted.net> wrote:
>
> http://www.securelist.com/en/blog/667/The_Mystery_of_the_Duqu_Framework
>
> Haven't seen this (or much discussion around this) here yet, so I figured
> I'd share.
>
> --
> -Joe.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> https://twitter.com/#!/nenolod/status/178352865667067904
> <https://twitter.com/#%21/nenolod/status/178352865667067904>
>
> not told [ ]
> told [x ]
>
>
> Put the crack pipe down.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
> My post was Williams response to Kaspersky, wasn't directed to you. Do try
> and keep up.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/