full-disclosure - Re: The Mystery of the Duqu Framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <17789.1331438646@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:04:06 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: William Pitcock <nenolod@...teminplace.net>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: The Mystery of the Duqu Framework

On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:16:26 CST, William Pitcock said:
> If it looks like COM, smells like COM, and acts like COM, then it's
> probably COM.  It certainly isn't "some new programming language" like
> Kaspersky says.  That's just the dumbest thing I've heard this year.

So what you're saying here is that there's a lot of people accepting
security advice and/or software from professionals who wouldn't recognize
a COM object if it came up and bit them on the butt...

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/