lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4F5C3F52.60907@systeminplace.net> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:59:46 -0600 From: William Pitcock <nenolod@...teminplace.net> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk Subject: Re: The Mystery of the Duqu Framework On 3/10/2012 10:04 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote: > On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:16:26 CST, William Pitcock said: > >> If it looks like COM, smells like COM, and acts like COM, then it's >> probably COM. It certainly isn't "some new programming language" like >> Kaspersky says. That's just the dumbest thing I've heard this year. >> > So what you're saying here is that there's a lot of people accepting > security advice and/or software from professionals who wouldn't recognize > a COM object if it came up and bit them on the butt... > > Either that or it's intentional misinformation. Whichever is worse is for the users of Kaspersky products to decide, I suppose. William _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists