[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F6F2ADE.3060607@simons-rock.edu>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:25:34 -0400
From: Charlie Derr <cderr@...ons-rock.edu>
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: Apple IOS security issue pre-advisory record
On 03/23/2012 07:26 PM, Michal Zalewski wrote:
>> I find it very unfortunate that 300 supposed security professionals clicked
>> on a hidden link like that without first checking what it was, or if not
>> simply ignoring it like I did!!!
>
> So how do you meaningfully "check what it is" without actually
> requesting the document?
>
> And what's the difference between that post and a hidden<img> or
> <iframe> included on a less obvious website?
>
> /mz
YMMV, but I always figured attempting to grab things with links or lynx from a command-line GNU/linux environment ought
to be fairly safe, even for files that I'm pretty certain contain viral/trojan code (and to state the obvious, I don't
execute anything that I download, I simply use tools to view). And for the record, I didn't get a chance to do that in
this case, as I missed the original post.
best,
~c
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists