full-disclosure - Re: cDc Created Hong Kong Blondes and 'Hacktivism' as a Media Hack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8160.1336146120@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 11:42:00 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: cDc Created Hong Kong Blondes and
	'Hacktivism' as a Media Hack

On Thu, 03 May 2012 19:24:29 -0000, Wei Honker said:

> If Anonymous truly wants to make a difference they need to evolve
> beyond the simple DDoS attacks, web defacements and the media hack
> that currently defines hacktivsm and become the movement they want to
> be.

Cool story, bro.

First fallacy: Anonymous is a plural noun, not singular.  It's not one thing with
a cohesive leadership, plan, and direction, it's a bunch of things all wandering in
the same semi-general direction.  There is no singular "wants" to Anonymous.

Second fallacy: Evenif Anonymous as a whole wants one thing, there is no actual
evidence that the one thing is to be anything more than DDoS/defacement/media
hacks.  They seem content at that.

Third fallacy: Never underestimate the value of a good media hack.  Consider
the Maine, the Lusitania, the Gulf of Tonkin, and yellowcake uranium - all to some
extent media hacks.

Overall grade: B-.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/