[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOpQXKOq=QTL71qm1LiH1B2Ny3Qj+xNSMh3D1yUSuRSE9_7r7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:06:41 +0100
From: imipak <imipak@...il.com>
To: guninski@...inski.com, Full Disclosure <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Full Disclosure] Unauthorized Digital
Certificates Could Allow Spoofing
> what does this mean?
>
> m$ inadvertently gave signing rights to lusers, they got rooted or
something else?
>
http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2012/06/03/microsoft-certification-authority-signing-certificates-added-to-the-untrusted-certificate-store.aspx
says:
"[..] certificates issued by our Terminal Services licensing certification
authority, which are intended to only be used for license server
verification, could also be used to sign code as Microsoft. Specifically,
when an enterprise customer requests a Terminal Services activation
license, the certificate issued by Microsoft in response to the request
allows code signing without accessing Microsoft’s internal PKI
infrastructure."
-i
--
wake up the past
and tell it to stay away
Content of type "text/html" skipped
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists