| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:40:03 -0400 From: "Mikhail A. Utin" <mutin@...monwealthcare.org> To: "paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au" <paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au>, "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> Subject: Re: Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 89, Issue 11: ] How much time is appropriate for fixing Dear Paul, You completely missed my point. I was talking about the foundation of this list, which is free service, and the foundation of a lot of current IT technologies, which is freeware. Giving knowledge for free (including software bugs) is the foundation of this civilization. Having profit is a necessity but not all what drives us. Could you personally show any your contribution to the society? Which was not paid for? My contribution you can find searching/google for my name and "article", and DeepSec 2011 and OWASP AppSec DC 2012 presentations as well. Nobody paid me for. Plus, you can check our portal www.201cmr1700ma.com, which provides knowledge and security documents for free. Then, considering you association with math science, you can possibly estimate the time I've spent for free. So, my voice pro free knowledge distribution is completely legitimate. Sincerely Mikhail utin, CISSP, PhD -----Original Message----- From: paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au [mailto:paul.szabo@...ney.edu.au] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 6:41 PM To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk; Mikhail A. Utin Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 89, Issue 11: ] How much time is appropriate for fixing Dear Mikhail, >> From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@...merofgod.com> >> To: Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>, Stefan Kanthak >> <stefan.kanthak@...go.de> >> Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" >> <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk> >> >> I'm not contradicting myself at all - in fact, *you* are the exact >> type of person I'm talking about. You couldn't give a rat's ass >> about the industry or anyone but yourself. Nothing you have ever >> done has been "valuable" to anyone other than you; it has been >> completely self-serving egotistical bullshit. > > I completely agree with Thor. ... You cannot possibly agree with someone who addresses two people in the singular. You should not agree with someone who ascribes behaviourial patterns to others, based on his own character traits. Are you familiar with Georgi's work? Please look at his website before proffering opinions. Cheers, Paul Paul Szabo psz@...hs.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/ School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Australia CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender immediately or by telephone at (617) 426-0600 and destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments. For further information regarding Commonwealth Care Alliance's privacy policy, please visit our Internet web site at http://www.commonwealthcare.org. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists