lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:59:26 -0400
From: Григорий Братислава <musntlive@...il.com>
To: Ali Varshovi <ali.varshovi@...mail.com>
Cc: "full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk" <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Linux - Indicators of compromise

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Ali Varshovi <ali.varshovi@...mail.com> wrote:
> Greetings FD,
>
> Does anyone have any guidelines/useful material on analysis logs of a Linux machine to detect signs of compromise? The data collection piece is not a challenge as a lot of useful information can be captured using commands and some scripts. I'm wondering if there is any systematic approach to analyze the collected logs? Most of the materials I've seen are more aligned to malware and rootkit detection which is not the only concern apparently.
>
> Thanks,
> Ali

Is in my experience is that I place two folders in directory in is
root folder called /root/MilaKunisLeakedPhotos/ and
/root/OlgaKurlyenko/ is when I see is accessed. Then I know is my
machine compromised. Everyone is want see Olga and Mila

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists